In the Linux world there are so many packages available that you have to choose what you want to install. I think you hit the nail on the head here. You get with Reapack and are faced with 4 billion JSFX to wade through So my impression is that anything related to free instrument content would not be pristinely curated through weekly Powerpoint presentations in the Cockos office.īTW.: compare: Any Linux distribution "comes with" hundreds of applications that can optionally be downloaded and installed by the appropriate package manager.Īfter following this thread for a while, I'd like to add my tuppence worth (or 2 cents if you're from across the pond). Anyway, as probably mentioned, one person's favorite free instrument is someone else's earliest gag reflex trigger. When there are such amazing free VSTi resources as Decent Sampler and the ridiculously generous pianobook site for free real instruments and not-real keyboards, and the KVR archive, I don't want Justin, Schwa and whoever else to pick their heads up from taking care of Reaper to get involved in content. If it's any hassle just consider it the cost of it being free and take the 30 seconds to have the link delivered to your burner (throwaway account that isn't used for anything except downloading free plugins) email. I don't get how it's so much trouble to find a free VSTi of xyz. I think the issue of whether added content is bloatware is really secondary to the devs not wanting to have to get support posts about why a synth's LFO won't automate or when the Piano vst will be updated.to support soft pedal.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |